Physics-based modeling of skier mobility and avalanche rescue in mountainous terrain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobility models play an important role in the evaluation of wireless ad hoc networks. However, most existing mobility models are limited to 1D or 2D user movement. In this paper, we propose a novel 2.5D mobility model suitable for modeling the movement of backcountry skiers in mountainous terrains. These skiers carry wireless devices for communication in the event of emergencies, such as an avalanche, and thus form a dynamic mobile wireless ad hoc network. Our model represents groups of skiers, with each group having an invisible leader who determines the general direction of movement. We calculate the acceleration, velocity, and position of the group leader based on properties of the terrain, gravitational force, and a randomized sine function. To simulate the coordinated mobility of group members, we use a flocking model, which applies cohesion, separation, and alignment forces to influence group members to follow their leader, while avoiding collisions with each other. To demonstrate the applicability of our model, we use simulation to evaluate the skier rescue probability in the event of an avalanche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".