Evidence That the Amino-Terminal Composition of Non-(1–84) Parathyroid Hormone Fragments Starts before Position 19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Non-(1-84) parathyroid hormone (PTH) fragments are large C-terminal fragments of PTH with a partially preserved N-terminal structure. They differ from other C-terminal PTH fragments, which do not have an N-terminal structure and do not react in intact PTH assays. We aimed to identify the minimal N-terminal structure common to all non-(1-84) PTH fragments. METHODS: Sera obtained from six healthy individuals and six patients with primary hyperparathyroidism, and six serum pools from dialysis patients with different PTH concentrations were fractionated by HPLC and analyzed by four different PTH assays. Each assay was characterized by saturation analysis of its detection antibody and capacity to react with different PTH fragments. Human PTH(1-84) [hPTH(1-84)] calibrators were normalized to an in-house hPTH(1-84) calibrator. RESULTS: The cyclase-activating PTH (CA-PTH) assay had an early (1, 2,) epitope and reacted only with hPTH(1-84). The other assays had epitopes in region (13-34). Total and intact PTH assays had epitopes proximal to position 18 and reacted equally well with hPTH(1-84) and hPTH(7-84), and the Elecsys PTH assay had an epitope distal to position 19, being saturable by hPTH(18-48) and also reacting with [Tyr(34)]hPTH(19-84). The HPLC profiles obtained with these assays showed that non-(1-84) PTH fragments did not react in the CA-PTH assay, as expected. The amount of non-(1-84) PTH detected by the other three assays was similar when the assay results were normalized to a common calibrator. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the amount of non-(1-84) PTH detected by epitopes proximal or distal to position 19 of the PTH structure is identical, indicating a common minimum structure starting before position 19. This in turn points to a probable high-affinity interaction with the C-PTH receptor, as observed previously with [Tyr(34)]hPTH(19-84) in various cell lines and in mouse osteocytes with PTH/PTHrP type I receptor ablation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".