MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116094032 · doi:10.1016/j.pedneo.2013.01.006

Perspectives on Intussusception

2013· editorial· en· W2116094032 on OpenAlex
Lung‐Huang Lin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatrics & Neonatology · 2013
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntussusception (medical disorder)MedicineIncidence (geometry)Presentation (obstetrics)Retrospective cohort studyGeneral surgeryPediatricsEnemaSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The annual incidence of global intussusception varies from year to year in many reports from both developing and developed countries. Most studies reporting on the incidence of intussusception are hospital based. In general, they are retrospective chart reviews of patients with intussusception in a single hospital over a specific period or they represent the experience of a surgeon or a group of surgeons. Retrospective hospital-based studies may underestimate the incidence of intussusception because they do not take account of patients who may present in other hospitals or clinics in the region, those who died outside the hospital, or those treated for an alternative diagnosis. Conversely, the incidence of intussusception may be overestimated in some hospital-based studies because varying levels of evidence are required to make the diagnosis. For example, in some regions, patients with a history and examination findings suggestive of intussusception may be treated with an air or hydrostatic enema without formal documentation of intussusception by radiology or surgery. If the symptoms resolve following the enema treatment, then it is presumed that the patients had intussusception.1Bines J.E. Ivanoff B. Acute intussusception in infants and children: incidence, clinical presentation, and management: a global perspective. Vaccines and Biologicals WHO, 2002Google Scholar Male predominance among patients presenting with intussusception was consistently reported in studies from the USA and Canada. The mean age of presentation was 6.4 months (range 1–11 months).2Murphy T.V. Gargiullo P.M. Massoudi M.S. Nelson D.B. Jumaan A.O. Okoro C.A. et al.Intussusception among infants given an oral rotavirus vaccine.N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 564-572Crossref PubMed Scopus (847) Google Scholar The annual rate of intussusception-associated hospitalization increased five-fold at 5 months of age and remained elevated until 7 months of age (Parashar et al., 2000).3Parashar U.D. Holman R.C. Cummings K.C. Staggs N.W. Curns A.T. Zimmerman C.M. et al.Trends in Intussusception-Associated Hospitalizations and Deaths Among US Infants.Pediatrics. 2000; 106: 1413-1421Crossref PubMed Scopus (191) Google Scholar Recently, Yen et al4Yen C. Tate J.E. Steiner C.A. Cortese M.M. Pate M.M. Parashar U.D. Trends in intussusception hospitalizations among US infants before and after implementation of the rotavirus vaccination program, 2000–2009.J Infect Dis. 2012; 206: 41-48Crossref PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar reported that, for infants aged 15–24 and 25–34 weeks, intussusception hospitalization rates tended to be lower in the postvaccine years but were not significantly different compared with the average prevaccine rates. The overall intussusception hospitalization rate for infants aged younger than 12 months was slightly higher in 2007 (rate ratio [RR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.18; p = 0.001) compared with the average prevaccine rate from 2000–2005, whereas the rates in 2008 (RR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.89–1.01; p = 0.09) and 2009 (RR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87–0.99; p = 0.03) subsequently decreased. The incidence of intussusception was determined based on retrospective data from five hospitals in Taiwan covering the period 1955–1964.5Clarke Jr., E.J. Phillips I.A. Alexander E.R. Adenovirus infection in intussusception in children in Taiwan.JAMA. 1969; 208: 1671-1674Crossref PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar In this study, the incidence rate was 0.77 per 1000 live births, with 82% of patients under 1 year of age. During this period, the hospitals treated 42.4 cases of acute intussusception in children per year. A later publication from Taipei reported 21.3 new cases per year and indicated that only 37.5% of patients were less than 1 year of age.6Hsu H.Y. Kao C.L. Huang L.M. Ni Y.H. Lai H.S. Lin F.Y. et al.Viral etiology of intussusception in Taiwanese childhood.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998; 17: 893-898Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar Such discrepancies in the numbers and ages of patients may be partly explained by the different study designs. Nonetheless, a change in the epidemiology of intussusception in Taiwan over a 30-year period cannot be excluded. A large study identified 6988 cases of intussusception in Taiwan from 1999 to 2001.7Ho W.L. Yang T.W. Chi W.C. Chang H.J. Huang L.M. Chang M.H. Intussusception in Taiwanese children: analysis of incidence, length of hospitalization and hospital costs in different age groups.J Formos Med Assoc. 2005; 104: 398-401PubMed Google Scholar Among them, 4859 cases occurred in children less than 15 years of age who had an average incidence of 34.5 per 100,000. The highest incidence occurred among children between 12 and 24 months of age, with the peak incidence of 118.8 per 100,000 observed in children younger than 24 months of age. In 2000, among patients younger than 15 years of age who were hospitalized for intussusception, males were more likely to be affected than females (61.3% vs. 38.7%). Intussusception-related hospitalizations were rare in infants in the first few months of life, but increased in infants 6–12 months old, and peaked in those who were 1–3 years of age. Chen et al8Chen S.C. Wang J.D. Hsu H.Y. Leong M.M. Tok T.S. Chin Y.Y. Epidemiology of childhood intussusception and determinants of recurrence and operation: analysis of national health insurance data between 1998 and 2007 in Taiwan.Pediatr Neonatol. 2010; 51: 285-291Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar reported a total of 8217 intussusception-related hospitalizations affecting 7541 children in Taiwan. The incidence of intussusception peaked between 3 and 36 months of age. The male-to-female incidence rate ratio increased from 1.31 in the first year to 2.52 in the 9th year of life. Adenovirus infection is linked to intussusception in children in Taiwan.5Clarke Jr., E.J. Phillips I.A. Alexander E.R. Adenovirus infection in intussusception in children in Taiwan.JAMA. 1969; 208: 1671-1674Crossref PubMed Scopus (42) Google Scholar A study by Hsu et al6Hsu H.Y. Kao C.L. Huang L.M. Ni Y.H. Lai H.S. Lin F.Y. et al.Viral etiology of intussusception in Taiwanese childhood.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998; 17: 893-898Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar found 27 of 61 (44.3%) intussusception patients but only two of 52 (3.8%) healthy controls had nonenteric adenovirus in throat and rectal specimens (p < 0.001). Of the 27 (74.1%) patients who shed adenovirus, 20 were older than 1 year of age. Among 43 patients with available paired sera, acute primary viral infection was found in 17 (39.5%) with adenovirus, four (9.3%) with human herpesvirus (HHV)-6, five (11.6%) with HHV-7, two (4.7%) with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and none with cytomegalovirus. Multiple viral infections occurred in six patients. The adenovirus genome was detected in four of the nine mesenteric lymph nodes but in only three of the 60 (5%) acute phase sera. Guarner and coworkers9Guarner J. de Leon-Bojorge B. Lopez-Corella E. Ferebee-Harris T. Gooding L. Garnett C.T. et al.Intestinal intussusception associated with adenoviral infection in Mexican children.Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 120: 845-850Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar presented data showing species C adenovirus in 33% (4/12) of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from Mexican pediatric patients with intestinal intussusception. The viral antigens and nucleic acids were localized in the epithelial and mononuclear inflammatory cells. The sequential detection strategy was found useful and readily applicable to archived samples. Its application to a larger pediatric population that includes patients from different countries may confirm the present evidence that adenovirus, especially species C, is a frequent cause of intussusception in Mexican children and possibly other countries like the USA. Recently, Chen and Lin10Chen C.A. Lin L.H. Intussusception incidence and adenoviral infection in children in a medical center.Acta Paediat Taiwan. 2011; 52: 92Google Scholar reported 34 children with intussusception who were hospitalized in a pediatric ward in Taipei in the period of January 2008 to June 2011. In this study, 12 patients (35%) were diagnosed as having intussusception in April, May, and June 2011. In the same 3 months, there were 512 patients with positive adenoviral culture, 123 with positive adenoviral antigen (January 2008–June 2011), 172 (33.59%) with positive adenoviral culture, and 61 (49.59%) with positive adenoviral antigen, respectively. However, there has been some discussion on the substantiation of the diagnosis. Nonetheless, their findings suggest that spring and early summer have the highest incidence of intussusception, which are also the seasons with the greatest incidence of adenoviral infections. Thus, adenovirus is likely related to the pathogenesis of intussusception. In this issue of the journal, Hsiao et al11Hsiao C.C. Tsao L.Y. Lai C.H. Nationwide population-based epidemiologic study of childhood and adulthood intussusception in Taiwan.Pediatr Neonatol. 2013; 54: 188-193Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar report that intussusception is quite different between children and adults in Taiwan. There are slightly more male patients than female patients among children and the peak age of incidence is 1–2 years, which is later compared with that in other countries. The incidence of adult intussusception is substantially lower and adult patients have significantly higher rates of coexisting neoplasms and malignancies and higher average medical expenses. Evaluation for neoplasms, especially for colon cancer and metastatic lesions, should be provided for adult patients with intussusception. In developed countries, the incidence of acute intussusception in infants and children is reportedly between 0.5 and 4.3 cases per 1000 live births or 0.66–1.2 cases per 1000 children less than 1 year of age. Due to the fact that adults present with acute, subacute, or chronic nonspecific symptoms, the initial diagnosis can be missed or delayed and established only when the patient is on the operating table. Most surgeons accept that adult intussusception requires surgical intervention because of the large proportion of structural anomalies and the high incidence of concomitant malignancy.12Marinis A. Yiallourou A. Samanides L. Dafnios N. Anastasopoulos G. Vassiliou I. et al.Intussusception of the bowel in adults: a review.World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15: 407-411Crossref PubMed Scopus (404) Google Scholar However, the extent of bowel resection and the manipulation of the intussuscepted bowel during reduction remain controversial. By contrast to pediatric patients, where intussusception is primary and benign, preoperative reduction with barium or air is not suggested as a definite treatment for adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it