MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116094337 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518047

Sensor selection for mitigation of RSS-based attacks in wireless local area network positioning

2008· article· en· W2116094337 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRSSComputer scienceComputer networkContext (archaeology)Wireless sensor networkHybrid positioning systemResilience (materials science)WirelessWi-FiWireless networkReal-time computingPoint (geometry)Positioning systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Positioning in wireless networks has gained significant ground as an enabling technology for various applications such as event detection and context awareness. Since these positioning systems rely on radio features to locate a mobile, they are susceptible to non-cryptographic attacks resulting from malicious alteration of the propagation environment. This paper proposes a sensor selection scheme for increasing the resilience of fingerprinting-based positioning systems to RSS-based attacks in the context of wireless local area networks (WLAN). A distributed positioning scheme is proposed whereby an estimate is obtained from each WLAN access point (AP). Sensor selection is performed based on a nonparametric estimate of the Fisher information. Experimental results indicate superior performance compared to existing methods and graceful performance degradation in presence of RSS attacks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.550

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it