Defining the extended substrate specificity of kallikrein 1-related peptidases
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human kallikrein 1-related peptidases (KLKs) form a subfamily of 15 extracellular (chymo)tryptic-like serine proteases. KLKs 4, 5, 13 and 14 display altered expression/activity in diverse pathological conditions, including cancer. However, their distinct (patho)physiological roles remain largely uncharacterized. As a step toward distinguishing their proteolytic functions, we attempt to define their primary and extended substrate specificities and identify candidate biological targets. Heterologously expressed KLKs 4, 5, 13 and 14 were screened against fluorogenic 7-amino-4-carbamoylmethylcoumarin positional scanning-synthetic combinatorial libraries with amino acid diversity at the P1-P4 positions. Our results indicate that these KLKs share a P1 preference for Arg. However, each KLK exhibited distinct P2-P4 specificities, attributable to structural variations in their surface loops. The preferred P4-P1 substrate recognition motifs based on optimal subsite occupancy were as follows: VI-QSAV-QL-R for KLK4; YFWGPV-RK-NSFAM-R for KLK5; VY-R-LFM-R for KLK13; and YW-KRSAM-HNSPA-R for KLK14. Protein database queries using these motifs yielded many extracellular targets, some of which represent plausible KLK substrates. For instance, cathelicidin, urokinase-type plasminogen activator, laminin and transmembrane protease serine 3 were retrieved as novel putative substrates for KLK4, 5, 13 and 14, respectively. Our findings may facilitate studies on the role of KLKs in (patho)physiology and can be used in the development of selective KLK inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it