MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116110096 · doi:10.1680/geot.14.p.40

Serviceability limit state design of deep foundations

2014· article· en· W2116110096 on OpenAlexaff
Farzaneh Naghibi, Gordon A. Fenton, D. V. Griffiths

Bibliographic record

VenueGéotechnique · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsServiceability (structure)Limit state designEngineeringSettlement (finance)Geotechnical engineeringCivil engineeringFoundation (evidence)Probabilistic logicShallow foundationReliability (semiconductor)Forensic engineeringComputer scienceLawBearing capacity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the settlement of deep foundations (piles) is not generally a concern if the piles are driven to refusal, settlement can become a design issue if no stiff substratum is encountered. This paper investigates the reliability-based design factors required for the serviceability limit state design of deep foundations. The goals of the paper are first to develop a probabilistic deep foundation model, which includes the effects of spatial variability and which is validated by simulation, and second to recommend the geotechnical resistance factors required to achieve specified target reliability indices against excessive settlement of deep foundations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéotechniqueSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207