MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116127679

Trend Analysis of Road Salt Impacts on Groundwater Salinity at a Long-term Monitoring Site

2006· article· en· W2116127679 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G Liu, R A Widger, Y C Jin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwaterEnvironmental scienceStatistical analysisSalinityHydrology (agriculture)Trend analysisEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringGeologyGeotechnical engineeringStatisticsOceanographyMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes how a large amount of deicing salt is being applied each year on highways in North America in order to keep roads passable and safe. There have been concerns about the potential for the salt migrating downward to contaminate groundwater quality. The University of Regina and Saskatchewan Highways and Transportation have conducted a long term salt impact monitoring study on a section of highway near Regina, Saskatchewan. This paper presents the groundwater portion of this long-term monitoring study on the environmental impacts of road salt. Salt concentration data from three monitoring wells beside the highway section are presented for initial analysis, and the data from one well is analyzed to detect trends using non-parametric statistical approaches. The statistical tests show that chloride concentration has a significant upward trend with an increase of 0.2 mg/L per year at the significance level of 0.05 over more than ten years monitoring period. However, no significant upward trend is found for sodium concentration data at the same significance level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207