Seed production and gametophyte formation in<i>Agave tequilana</i>and<i>Agave americana</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agave tequilana Weber var. azul is the raw material used in the production of tequila. This species has a life cycle of approximately 6–8 years; however, owing to the practice of removing the inflorescence to conserve accumulated sugar reserves, the main form of reproduction is asexual. Little attention has, therefore, been paid to the process of flowering and the factors leading to low levels of germination and seedling viability have not been investigated in detail. The objective of this study was to document gametophyte development, seed production, and germination in A. tequilana under different pollination treatments and in an interspecies cross with Agave americana L. Seed production and germination efficiency was low for both A. tequilana and A. americana under the different pollination treatments, although interspecies crosses did produce some viable seeds. Development of the male gametophyte in both species is of the successive type, producing pollen grains with dicolpate morphology. Female gametophyte development is of the Polygonum monosporic type. The results obtained suggest that genetic incompatibility, inbreeding effects, factors affecting pollen development and germination, or errors in female gametophyte development may contribute to the low fertility observed for A. tequilana and A. americana.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".