MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116137289 · doi:10.5539/cis.v8n1p108

FPGA-Based Fully Parallel PCA-ANN for Spectrum Sensing

2015· article· en· W2116137289 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdessamad Elrharras, S. El Moukhlis, Rachid Saadane, Mohamed Wahbi, A. Hamdoun

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer and Information Science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVHDLField-programmable gate arrayPerceptronArtificial neural networkMATLABPrincipal component analysisCognitive radioPrincipal (computer security)Interference (communication)ImplementationArtificial intelligenceComputer hardwarePattern recognition (psychology)Channel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cognitive radio system is proposed as an optimal way to improve the frequency underutilization. Spectrum sensing is the first and the essential function in this approach. A cognitive user must sense his environment to detect the unused channels, and then he can use the free channel without causing any interference to the primary user. In this article, an innovative technique is proposed for spectrum sensing based on principal component analysis and neural networks in frequency domain. The designed blocks are described using VHSIC Hardware Description Language (VHDL). The suggested application consists of extracting features from the captured signals by PCA; the classification is done by a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). Neural network training part and principal components are done on MATLAB environment; while the hardware implementations are created on an FPGA DE2-70board.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer and Information ScienceSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207