MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116137820 · doi:10.3747/co.22.2431

An Open-Label Expanded-Access Trial of Bendamustine in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma or Previously Untreated Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: BEND-ACT

2015· article· en· W2116137820 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
C. Tom Kouroukis, Michael Crump, David MacDonald, Jean-François Larouche, Douglas A. Stewart, James B. Johnston, Stéphanie Sauvageau, E. Beausoleil, P. Bioulac Sage, Sydney Dubois, Anna Christofides, S. Di Clemente, Laurie H. Sehn

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of CalgaryHôpital de l'Enfant-JésusDalhousie UniversityUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalJuravinski Cancer Centre
FundersNational Cancer InstituteLundbeck Canada
KeywordsBendamustineMedicineTolerabilityNeutropeniaRituximabInternal medicineChronic lymphocytic leukemiaAdverse effectNauseaRefractory (planetary science)OncologyLymphomaLeukemiaChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.460
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207