Évolution de la structure diamétrale et de la composition des peuplements mixtes de sapin baumier et d'épinette rouge de la forêt primitive après une coupe à diamètre limite sur l'Aire d'observation de la rivière Ouareau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using data from 41 plots, the diameter structure and composition of old-growth mixed stands composed mainly of balsam fir (Abies basalmea (L.) Mill.) and red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.) were characterized. The stand table was organized in five groups of diameter classes, and we characterized the basal area of four tree species in each group. Analysis showed that diameter structure tends toward a reverse J-shaped curve. Red spruce and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.) were more abundant among large diameter trees while balsam fir was more abundant among saplings. A comparison with 18 permanent plots from a diameter-limit cutting showed that plots had come back to a structure similar to that of the old-growth forest 47 years after cutting. However, spruce ratios had decreased while those of balsam fir and paper birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) had increased. Red spruce decrease is not due to a lack of regeneration but to overcutting. Single-tree selection method would be a suitable treatment if aimed at protecting red spruce trees up to a given diameter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".