MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116161613 · doi:10.1109/tap.2010.2041152

Compact Elongated Mushroom (EM)-EBG Structure for Enhancement of Patch Antenna Array Performances

2010· article· en· W2116161613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialPatch antennaAntenna arrayAntenna (radio)Computer scienceCoupling (piping)PhysicsOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceAcousticsOpticsTopology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> A compact elongated mushroom electromagnetic band-gap (EM-EBG) structure, exploiting the thickness of the substrate to achieve higher isolation compared to the case of the conventional mushroom EBG (CM-EBG), is proposed for the enhancement of the performances of patch antenna arrays. Guidelines, based on fairly accurate formulas, are provided for the design of the stop-band of the structure. The compactness of the EM-EBG is investigated and shown to be superior to that of the CM-EBG in practical cases. The superior reduction of mutual coupling of the EM-EBG is demonstrated by full-wave and experimental results both for a pair of patches and for a 4-element patch array. Finally, the benefits of the EM-EBG in terms of array processing, specifically side-lobe level (SLL) control and direction of arrival (DOA) estimation, are presented. </para>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it