MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116168363 · doi:10.1109/ivtta.1998.727683

Automation of locality recognition in ADAS Plus

2002· article· en· W2116168363 on OpenAlexaffabout
V. Gupta, Serge Robillard, Claude Pelletier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectoryPhoneComputer scienceAutomationListing (finance)Service (business)Product (mathematics)Advanced driver assistance systemsSpeech recognitionDatabaseWorld Wide WebOperating systemArtificial intelligenceEngineeringBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In North America, people call the directory assistance operator to find the phone number of a business or residential listing. The directory assistance service is generally maintained by telcos, and it represents a significant cost to them. Partial or complete automation of directory assistance would result in significant cost savings for telcos. Nortel has a product called Automated Directory Assistance System (ADAS) Plus which partially automates this directory assistance function through the use of speech recognition. The system has been deployed all across Quebec, through most of U S West and BellSouth. ADAS Plus primarily automates the response to the question "for what city?" through speech recognition. We give details of this speech recognition system and outline its performance in the deployed regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207