Determinants of surface membrane and transverse-tubular excitability in skeletal muscle: implications for high-intensity exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The fatigue of high-intensity exercise is now believed to reside primarily within the excitation–contraction coupling processes associated with the plasma membrane of skeletal muscle (sarcolemm) and calcium-mediated events leading to myofilament sliding. This paper summarizes recent developments and advances in the identification of factors that contribute to changes in sarcolemmal excitability of mammalian skeletal muscle as a consequence of high-intensity exercise. There is an increasing recognition of the probable role that is played by the transverse tubular system (T-system), a system that comprises c . 80% of the total sarcolemmal surface capable of ion exchange. Furthermore, the fluid within the T-system has limited access to interstitial fluid bathing myofibres; hence, T-system fluid is probably markedly different from interstitial fluid during high-intensity exercise. Mechanically skinned fibre preparation is providing many new insights into functions of the surface membrane and T-system in fatigue. A scenario is developed whereby accumulation of potassium within the T-system ([K + ] o ) contributes to reduced membrane excitability, as well as lowering of T-system sodium and chloride, concomitant with loss of intracellular potassium ([K + ] i ) and accumulation of intracellular sodium ([Na + ]) and chloride ([Cl − ]). Lowering the [Na + ] o /[Na + ] i ratio and raising myoplasmic [Na + ] i have been shown to decrease membrane excitability and impair action potential propagation. Maintained high [Cl − ] o may also have a protective effect in maintaining membrane excitability, and this effect appears to be very pronounced in the presence of raised [K + ] o . In contrast to dogma associating high [H + ] to fatigue, recent studies have also shown that induced acidosis that results in increased [H + ] o and [H + ] i restores force production in muscles and skinned fibres fatigued by intermittent tetanic stimulation. This effect may be due to a decrease in surface membrane Cl − permeability that serves to restore membrane excitability. During high-intensity exercise, simultaneous changes in trans-membrane ion concentrations and membrane ion conductances may serve to reduce impairment of membrane excitability that provides for a maintained, though reduced, contractile function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".