MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116189829 · doi:10.1089/ind.2010.6.164

REVIEW: Genome shuffling: A new trend in improved bacterial production of lactic acid

2010· article· en· W2116189829 on OpenAlexaff
Rojan P. John, G.S. Anisha, Ashok Pandey, K. Madhavan Nampoothiri

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Biotechnology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactic acidGenomeDNA shufflingBiologyMicroorganismProductivityBiotechnologyShufflingMetabolic engineeringPopulationProduction (economics)Biochemical engineeringComputational biologyGeneticsBacteriaGeneComputer scienceEngineeringDirected evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lactic acid is an environment-friendly chemical with a wide range of industrial applications that is the focus of researchers and biotechnologists worldwide. The economic production of lactic acid can be achieved by exploiting various biotechnological techniques. Among these is the improvement of microorganism strains for industrially desirable characteristics such as high yield and productivity of lactic acid and the ability to grow at low pH and to utilize complex agro-industrial wastes. Whole genome shuffling combines the advantages of dissimilar parents by allowing parental DNA shuffling and hence is believed to improve the characteristics of strains controlled by multiple genes. Recursive genomic recombination within a population of fusant microorganisms can generate strains efficiently with an amplified desirable phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial BiotechnologySame topicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionFrench-language works237,207