Adaptive iterative detectors for phase-uncertain channels via variational bounding
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of iterative detection/decoding of data symbols transmitted over an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel in the presence of phase uncertainty is addressed in this paper. By modelling the phase uncertainty either as an unknown deterministic variable/process or random variable/ process with a known a priori probability density function, a number of non-Bayesian and Bayesian detection algorithms with various amount of suboptimality have been proposed in the literature to solve the problem. In this paper, a new set of suboptimal iterative detection algorithms is obtained by utilizing the variational bounding technique. Especially, applying the generic variational Bayesian (VB) framework, efficient iterative joint estimation and detection/decoding schemes are derived for the constant phase model as well as for the dynamic phase model. In addition, the relation of the VB-based approach to the optimal noncoherent receiver as well as to the classical approach via the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is provided. Performance of the proposed detectors in the presence of a strong dynamic phase noise is compared to the performance of the existing detectors. Furthermore, an incremental scheduling of the VB (or EM) algorithm is shown to reduce the overall complexity of the receiver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it