Integrated end-stage renal disease care: the role of peritoneal dialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reviews the rationale behind the proposed policy of using peritoneal dialysis (PD) as the initial treatment modality in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The better preservation of residual renal function associated with PD is emphasized along with its potential cardiovascular benefits. The superior patient survival on PD, relative to hemodialysis, during the first 2 years on dialysis in both the United States and Canada is discussed, as are the potential advantages of PD in terms of hepatitis C prevention, anaemia management and quality of life. The lower cost of PD in association with these clinical advantages lead to the modality being more cost-effective in the early years on dialysis. The relatively high technique failure rate on PD, however, subsequently leads to an increasing need for haemodialysis. A policy of integrated dialysis care with PD first and then haemodialysis, as required, is advocated as a more cost-effective approach to ESRD in suitable patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".