MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116283133 · doi:10.1080/15320383.2011.571311

The Effect of Temperature and Aeration Rate on Bioremediation of Diesel-contaminated Soil in Solid-phase Bench-scale Bioreactors

2011· article· en· W2116283133 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Sanscartier, Ken Reimer, Barbara A. Zeeb, Iris Koch

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil and Sediment Contamination An International Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerationBioremediationVolatilisationBiodegradationBioreactorEnvironmental chemistryChemistrySoil waterSoil contaminationEnvironmental engineeringContaminationEnvironmental sciencePulp and paper industrySoil scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bioremediation of hydrocarbon (HC) contaminated soils is most effective in aerobic conditions. Despite the fact that mass transfer of oxygen is an important process parameter, the effect of this parameter on solid-phase bioremediation has received limited attention. In this study, the combined effect of temperature and aeration on the bioremediation of low organic content coarse-grained soils, freshly contaminated with diesel, was investigated in solid-phase bench-scale bioreactors. Total HC and carbon range soil concentrations, volatilization, and microbial activity were monitored throughout the six-month experiments at two temperatures (7 and 22°C) and at two aeration rates (13 and 45 mL·s−1). Total HC removal reached between 48 and 83%. Generally, removal increased proportionally with temperature and aeration rates, and decreased proportionally with HC compounds molecular weight. Both biodegradation and volatilization played important roles in removal in all treatments. The high aeration rate enhanced microbial activity in soil. Enhancement was believed to be due to increased mass transfer of oxygen from the soil gas to the soil solution, where microbial activity occurs. However, high aeration also enhanced volatilization, especially at 22°C where 51% of HCs were lost to volatilization. High aeration rate enhanced biodegradation of compounds > nC15 without promoting their excessive volatilization. Keywords: aeratedbiopilepetroleum hydrocarbonsvolatilizationbiodegradationcold climate Acknowledgments This work was financially supported by the Director General Environment of the Canadian Department of National Defense, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank the Analytical Services Group, Royal Military College (RMC), Kingston, ON, and the Analytical Services Unit, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, for help and guidance for data analysis; E. Creber and M. Serran for help in conducting laboratory work; Dr. R. Bathurst, Civil Engineering Department, RMC, for logistical support; and Dr. A. LeDuy, Département génie chimique, Université Laval, Québec, QC, for fruitful discussions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSoil and Sediment Contamination An International JournalSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207