Endothelin-1 in chronic renal failure and hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Investigation into the role of endothelin-1 (ET-1) in renal function has revealed two major direct actions leading to the control of extracellular volume and blood pressure. These are the regulation of renal hemodynamics and glomerular filtration rate and the modulation of sodium and water excretion. In the rat remnant kidney model of chronic renal failure, ET-1 production is increased in blood vessels and renal tissues. These changes are related to an increase in preproET-1 expression and correlate with the rise in blood pressure, the development of cardiovascular hypertrophy, and the degree of renal insufficiency and injury. Selective ETA receptor blockade prevents the progression of hypertension and the vascular and renal damage, supporting a role for ET-1 in chronic renal failure progression. The increase in ET-1 production can be associated with other local mediators, including angiotensin II, transforming growth factor-beta1 and nitric oxide, the local production of which is also altered in chronic renal failure. In human patients with essential hypertension, atherosclerosis, and nephrosclerosis, plasma ET-1 levels are increased compared with patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. Similarly, plasma ET-1 concentrations are markedly increased in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis, and this correlates with blood pressure, suggesting that ET-1 may contribute to hypertension in these patients. The treatment of anemia in patients with renal failure with human recombinant erythropoietin increases blood pressure by accentuating the underlying endothelial dysfunction and the elevated vascular ET-1 production. Overall, these results support a role for ET-1 in hypertension and the end-organ damage associated with chronic renal failure. ETA receptor blockade may then represent a potential target for the management of hypertension and cardiovascular and renal protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".