Bibliographic record
Abstract
The wavelength of x-ray radiation is much shorter than that of visible light. In fact, it is comparable to the distances between atoms in solids, which is on the order of one tenth of a nanometer. Using light of such a short wavelength, it is possible to study the structure of materials on the atom level. Scattering of x-rays has been developed into an invaluable tool to analyze various characteristics of matter, from the lattice structure of crystals to the structure of large biological molecules. In this way, we found that many of the properties of materials depend on their internal structure. To learn about changes in the structure of materials on the atom-level, time resolved x-ray scattering has proven a powerful technique. A wide variety of processes can be studied: from phase transitions in materials to vibrations in crystal lattices and pathways of chemical reactions. The aim of time-resolved studies is to follow these processes in real time. The timescale for changes in structure varies considerably depending on the underlying mechanism. Processes involving neighboring atoms typically take about 100\,fs. Structure changes involving large groups of atoms or molecules occure on a timescale of picoseconds to nanoseconds. Different mechanisms can be used to trigger changes in structure. Laser pulses with a duration of less than 100\,fs can be produced routinely and are used to initiate ultrafast changes in the structure. Alternatively, short electrical pulses can be used to trigger structural changes in piezo-electric materials. In this work, the main focus has been on experimental studies in order to deepen the understanding of structural changes in matter. The picosecond dynamics involved in the melting and recrystallization of a semiconductor, acoustic and thermal response of laser-excited solids, and the dynamics in the structure of a piezo-electric material have been studied. Additionally, instrumentation required for time-resolved x-ray scattering experiments has been developed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".