MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116348465 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.271

IEEE 802.11 WLAN Based Real-Time Location Tracking in Indoor and Outdoor Environments

2007· article· en· W2116348465 on OpenAlexaff
M.S. Emery, Mieso K. Denko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePath lossReal-time computingWireless lanWirelessReceived signal strength indicationIEEE 802.11Tracking (education)Radio propagationPoint (geometry)Wi-FiPath (computing)EstimationWireless networkComputer networkTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we propose an IEEE 802.11 wireless LAN (WLAN) based location tracking system for indoor and outdoor environments. The system is implemented using the received signal strength indication (RSSI) measurements and training-data based estimation techniques. Methods for acquiring, filtering and interpreting wireless data are discussed with emphasis on how they will be applied to wireless tracking. Training-data based estimation is performed by taking a series of RSSI measurements at known training points and then approximating the current location using the nearest neighbor algorithm. Propagation-based distance estimation is based on the Log-distance path loss model. Experiments are conducted for both training and propagation models to estimate the distance of the user from a known access point in indoor and outdoor locations. The experimental results that show the indoor and outdoor location estimation using the propagation model and training data are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207