MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116394319 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2004.842263

Approximate ML detection for MIMO systems using multistage sphere decoding

2005· article· en· W2116394319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature amplitude modulationMIMODecoding methodsConstellation diagramAlgorithmSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computer scienceConstellationGeneralizationQAMSIGNAL (programming language)MathematicsTelecommunicationsBit error ratePhysicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive a new multistage sphere decoding (MSD) algorithm, which is a generalization of the conventional sphere decoder (SD). This new MSD exploits that many higher order signal constellations can naturally be decomposed into several lower order constellations. We develop a two-stage SD for a 16-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (16QAM) multi-input multi-output (MIMO) system by decomposing 16QAM into two 4QAM constellations. The first stage generates a list of 4QAM vectors. For each of these, the second stage computes an optimal 4QAM vector. In the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region, our MSD performs close to the original (single-stage) SD, but it has a lower complexity. In the high SNR region, our MSD is not suitable for reaching near maximum likelihood (ML) performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it