MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116394319 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2004.842263

Approximate ML detection for MIMO systems using multistage sphere decoding

2005· article· en· W2116394319 on OpenAlexaff
Tao Cui, Chintha Tellambura

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadrature amplitude modulationMIMODecoding methodsConstellation diagramAlgorithmSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computer scienceConstellationGeneralizationQAMSIGNAL (programming language)MathematicsTelecommunicationsBit error ratePhysicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive a new multistage sphere decoding (MSD) algorithm, which is a generalization of the conventional sphere decoder (SD). This new MSD exploits that many higher order signal constellations can naturally be decomposed into several lower order constellations. We develop a two-stage SD for a 16-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (16QAM) multi-input multi-output (MIMO) system by decomposing 16QAM into two 4QAM constellations. The first stage generates a list of 4QAM vectors. For each of these, the second stage computes an optimal 4QAM vector. In the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) region, our MSD performs close to the original (single-stage) SD, but it has a lower complexity. In the high SNR region, our MSD is not suitable for reaching near maximum likelihood (ML) performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207