Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article reconstitue l’histoire de la distinction moderne privé/public dans la perspective de l’articulation entre l’État et la société civile. Cette distinction qui contraint continuellement le système politique organisé (l’espace « dit » public) à valider sa légitimité dans une autre sphère, tout aussi publique, mais « dite » privée (la société civile), est constitutive dans nos sociétés d’un espace politique pluraliste et démocratique. En rejetant la distinction moderne du privé et du public, autant le marxisme, la nouvelle gauche des années soixante, et plus récemment le féminisme et le postmodernisme, s’empêchent ainsi d’inscrire leur critique dans une conception démocratique pluraliste du politique. De fait est-il rappelé que ce procès intenté à la séparation du privé et du public repose souvent sur une conception erronée du sens attribué à cette distinction par les modernes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".