Towards Automatic Retrieval of Blink-Based Lexicon for Persons Suffered from Brain-Stem Injury using Video Cameras
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Directly connected to the brain, the eyes are the last part of our body we lose control of. For some persons, such as those suffered from a brain-stem stroke, the eyes provide the only means of communication with the world. The eye blinks for such persons are used to make their lexicon and the goal of many rehabilitation centers worldwide is to build tools that would allow automatic detection of the eye blink based lexicon. The tools designed so far are very cumbersome and still do not show the desired performance. At the same time, recent advances in computer hardware and computer vision, in particular, in motion and change detection, offered practitioners a new way for detecting blinks based on video observations of the person's face. This paper overviews different techniques to the problem and describes a vision-based system which is presently being tested in one of the rehabilitation centres. We show how to reliably detect a two-eye blink with a help of an off-the-shelf web-camera and present an approach to the detection a single-eye blink (wink) - this type of blinks is much harder to detect due the lack of spacial constrains, it is however the only type of movement some patients can exhibit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".