MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reliable Periodic Safety Message Broadcasting in VANETs Using Network Coding

2014· article· en· W2116447947 on OpenAlexaff
Behnam Hassanabadi, Shahrokh Valaee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLinear network codingComputer networkBroadcasting (networking)Coding (social sciences)Node (physics)Reliability (semiconductor)CollisionProtocol stackWireless sensor networkComputer securityNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable local information dissemination is the primary concern for periodic safety broadcasting in VANETs. We propose a sublayer in the application layer of the WAVE stack to increase the reliability of safety applications. Our design uses rebroadcasting of network coded safety messages, which considerably improves the overall reliability. It also tackles the synchronized collision problem stated in the IEEE 1609.4 standard as well as congestion problem and vehicle-to-vehicle channel loss. We propose a discrete phase type distribution to model the time transitions of a node state. Based on this model, a tight loss probability upper bound for the network coding algorithm is derived. Numerical results based on our analysis as well as ns-2 simulations show that our method outperforms the previous repetition-based algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations85
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207