Preferential Killing of Breast Tumor Initiating Cells by <i>N,N</i> -Diethyl-2-[4-(Phenylmethyl)Phenoxy]Ethanamine/Tesmilifene
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: N,N-Diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine (DPPE; tesmilifene) is thought to potentiate the antineoplastic effect of cytotoxic drugs. In a phase III randomized trial for metastatic breast cancer using doxorubicin with or without DPPE, addition of the latter resulted in a significant improvement in overall survival and a trend toward a difference in progression-free survival but, paradoxically, no difference in objective tumor response. Here we tested the hypothesis that DPPE targets breast tumor-initiating cells (TICs). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Human breast TICs from pleural effusions were identified as CD44(+):CD24(-/low) cells by flow cytometry and functionally by their ability to form nonadherent spheres in culture. Mouse mammary TICs from two different models of breast cancer were identified as cells capable of initiating spheres in culture and secondary tumors following transplantation into the mammary gland of syngeneic mice. RESULTS: We show that at physiologically attainable concentrations, treatment with DPPE alone reduced tumorsphere formation and viability of CD44(+):CD24(-/low) breast cancer cells. The kinetics of killing varied for the different breast tumor cells and required continuous exposure to the drug. Whereas doxorubicin killed CD44(+):CD24(-/low) and CD44(-):CD24(+) cells equally well, DPPE induced apoptosis preferentially in CD44(+):CD24(-/low) cells. Treatment of Her2/Neu(+) mammary tumor cells with DPPE in vitro efficiently killed TICs, as determined by flow cytometry and transplantation assays; DPPE further cooperated with doxorubicin to completely eradicate tumorigenic cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that continuous treatment with DPPE alone directly targets breast TICs, and provide rationale to test for cooperation between DPPE and known drugs with efficacy toward breast cancer subtypes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".