MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116542000

Nonlinear Bayesian state estimation: Review and recent trends

2011· article· en· W2116542000 on OpenAlex
J. Prakash, R. Bhushan Gopaluni, Sachin C. Patwardhan, Shankar Narasimhan, Sirish L. Shah

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Symposium on Advanced Control of Industrial Processes · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEstimationBayesian probabilityRecursive Bayesian estimationNonlinear systemProcess (computing)State (computer science)State variableMachine learningEstimation theoryData miningArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Process monitoring and control requires estimation of quality variables, which are often not measurable directly. A cost effective approach to monitor these variables in real time is to employ model based soft sensing and state estimation techniques. Dynamic model based state estimation is a rich and highly active area of research and many novel approaches have emerged over last few years. In this paper, we review recent developments in the area of recursive nonlinear Bayesian state and parameter estimation techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it