Differential responses to CO<sub>2</sub> and sympathetic stimulation in the cerebral and femoral circulations in humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relative importance of CO2 and sympathetic stimulation in the regulation of cerebral and peripheral vasculatures has not been previously studied in humans. We investigated the effect of sympathetic activation, produced by isometric handgrip (HG) exercise, on cerebral and femoral vasculatures during periods of isocapnia and hypercapnia. In 14 healthy males (28.1 +/- 3.7 (mean +/- S.D.) years), we measured flow velocity (VP; transcranial Doppler ultrasound) in the middle cerebral artery during euoxic isocapnia (ISO, +1 mmHg above rest) and two levels of euoxic hypercapnia (HC5, end-tidal P(CO(2)), P(ET,CO2), = +5 mmHg above ISO; HC10, P(ET,CO2) = +10 above ISO). Each P(ET,CO2) level was maintained for 10 min using the dynamic end-tidal forcing technique, during which increases in sympathetic activity were elicited by a 2-min HG at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction. Femoral blood flow (FBF; Doppler ultrasound), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; microneurography) and mean arterial pressure (MAP; Portapres) were also measured. Hypercapnia increased VP and FBF by 5.0 and 0.6% mmHg-1, respectively, and MSNA by 20-220%. Isometric HG increased MSNA by 50% and MAP by 20%, with no differences between ISO, HC5 and HC10. During the ISO HG there was an increase in cerebral vascular resistance (CVR; 20 +/- 11%), while VP remained unchanged. During HC5 and HC10 HG, VP increased (13% and 14%, respectively), but CVR was unchanged. In contrast, HG-induced sympathetic stimulation increased femoral vascular resistance (FVR) during ISO, HC5 and HC10 (17-41%), while there was a general decrease in FBF below ISO. The HG-induced increases in MSNA were associated with increases in FVR in all conditions (r = 0.76-0.87), whereas increases in MSNA were associated with increases in CVR only during ISO (r = 0.91). In summary, in the absence of hypercapnia, HG exercise caused cerebral vasoconstriction, myogenically and/or neurally, which was reflected by increases in CVR and a maintained VP. In contrast, HG increased FVR during conditions of ISO, HC5 and HC10. Therefore, the cerebral circulation is more responsive to alterations in PCO2, and less responsive to sympathetic stimulation than the femoral circulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".