MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116565870 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22113

Modelling of gradual internal reforming process over Ni‐YSZ SOFC anode with a catalytic layer

2014· article· en· W2116565870 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kelly Girona, Sébastien Sailler, P. Gélin, Nicolas Bailly, Samuel Georges, Yann Bultel

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolid oxide fuel cellSteam reformingAnodeMaterials scienceMethane reformerMethaneHydrogenCatalysisChemical engineeringCarbon fibersOxideHydrogen productionChemistryMetallurgyElectrodeComposite materialComposite numberPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Methane appears to be a fuel of great interest for solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) systems because it can be directly converted into hydrogen by Internal Reforming within the SOFC anode. To cope with carbon formation, a new SOFC cell configuration combining a catalyst layer with a classical anode was developed. The rate of the CH 4 consumption in the catalyst layer (Ir‐CGO) was determined experimentally for small values of steam to carbon ratios. This paper proposes a modelling and a simulation, using the CFD‐Ace software package, of the behaviour of a SOFC operated in Gradual Internal Reforming (GIR) conditions. This model of SOFC takes into account the kinetics of the steam reforming reaction in the catalyst layer in order to assess the influence of the steam to carbon ratio and the cell polarization. Because the risk of carbon formation is greater under GIR operation, a detailed thermodynamic analysis was carried out. Thermodynamic equilibrium calculations allowed us to predict the conditions of carbon formation occurrence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207