MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116568723 · doi:10.1109/scft.2000.878414

Partial-energy weighted interpolation of linear prediction coefficients

2002· article· en· W2116568723 on OpenAlexaff
Tamanna Islam, P. Kabal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)WeightingLinear interpolationMathematicsEnergy (signal processing)Frame (networking)Line (geometry)Representation (politics)Linear predictionAlgorithmComputer scienceMathematical analysisStatisticsTelecommunicationsGeometryAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the interpolation of linear prediction (LP) coefficients. The performance of LP analysis using different numbers of subframes and the choice of representation for the LP coefficients are studied. Interpolation is done by converting the LP coefficients in one of the following representations: line spectral frequencies, reflection coefficients, log area ratios, and autocorrelations. It is shown that good performance is obtained for line spectral frequencies and five subframes per frame. A new interpolation technique which incorporates partial frame energy is introduced. This technique generalizes the concept of energy weighting to different LP coefficient representations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.208

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207