Trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article examines recent trends in the incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer among Canadian men and women, then further analyzes trends by three subsites. DATA SOURCES: Incidence data for colorectal cancer were obtained from the National Cancer Incidence Reporting System and from the Canadian Cancer Registry. Mortality data were extracted from the Canadian Vital Statistics Database. Supplementary data on nutrition are from the National Population Health Survey. ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES: Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates were calculated for men and women. Age-specific incidence and mortality rates were calculated by 10-year age groups. Joinpoint analysis was applied to detect statistically significant changes in linear trends. MAIN RESULTS: Since the mid-1980s, colorectal cancer incidence has been declining, with steeper rates of decrease among women. Decreasing rates of colorectal cancer are limited to tumours located in the distal colon and rectum; the incidence of cancers of the proximal colon has not changed over time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".