Is abnormal myocardial repolarization associated with the occurrence of malignant tachyarrhythmias in Takotsubo cardiomyopathy?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormalities of cardiac repolarization are a hallmark of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TC), but their association with the occurrence of syncope and ventricular tachyarrhythmias is unknown. This study sought to assess the relationship between myocardial repolarization and malignant tachyarrhythmias in TC. METHODS: Clinical data and electrocardiographic repolarization parameters of 28 patients with TC and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (n = 26) or syncope (n = 2) were compared to data from 20 randomly selected patients with TC but without ventricular tachyarrhythmias or syncope. RESULTS: Study patients had significantly lower ejection fraction (EF) compared with controls (35 ± 14% vs. 46 ± 10%, p = 0.006). On day 1, no significant differences in repolarization parameters were observed. However, in the subgroup with ventricular fi brillation ([VF]; n = 10), Tpeak-Tend in lead V6 was significantly prolonged (97 ± 20 vs. 85 ± 19 ms; p = 0.04). Similarly, in the subgroup with torsade de pointes ([TdP]; n = 5) Tpeak-Tend in lead V4 was prolonged (127 ± 21 vs. 94 ± 27 ms; p = 0.001). On day 3, Tpeak-Tend in lead V3 (130 ± 51 vs. 105 ± 21 ms, p = 0.049) and Tpeak-Tend dispersion (56 ± 33 vs. 36 ± 21 ms; p = 0.03) were significantly longer in study patients. The difference in Tpeak-Tend in lead V3 was borderline in the VF subgroup, but significant in the subgroup with TdP. The latter group had also longer Tpeak-Tend in lead V4 and longer corrected QT interval in leads V3 and V4. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TC who experience malignant tachyarrhythmias have lower EF and a more pronounced alteration of the spatial dispersion of ventricular repolarization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".