MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116601704 · doi:10.1145/3532737.3532745

SIGACT News Complexity Theory Column 112

2022· article· en· W2116601704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lane A. Hemaspaandra

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGACT News · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicgraph theory and CDMA systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlameColumn (typography)Completeness (order theory)Bit (key)Computer scienceOperations researchPsychologyMathematicsTelecommunicationsComputer securitySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As I write this (in January), it is -7F (and -17F with the wind chill factor) here in Western New York, and looking at the pictures of this guest article's authors, I'm thinking that (from the outdoor pictures) Sweden and Switzerland are looking like pretty toasty places! (Robert's picture seems to be taken inside, but I see that currently the temperature is -15F in Montreal, so one can't blame him: brrrrrr! For completeness, Lund is currently 34F and Lausanne is currently 38F, but the time-zone di erence is helping them a bit... and also, for all I know those might be summer snaps.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score0.951

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3340.188

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGACT NewsSame topicgraph theory and CDMA systemsFrench-language works237,207