MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116613476

The Elliot Lake Uranium Miners’ Battle to Gain Occupational Health and Safety Improvements, 1950–1980

2012· article· en· W2116613476 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laurel Sefton MacDowell

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommissionBattlePolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)Nuclear industryEngineeringBusinessLawHistoryArchaeologyMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uranium miners in Elliot Lake went on a wildcat strike in 1974 to protest their occupational health concerns on the job after a spike in cancer cases. They learned that the provincial government had known of the poor working conditions causing their illnesses, but had not informed them of the dangers or acted to improve their situation. As a result of union and political pressure, the Ontario government created the Ham Commission to investigate and make recommendations. Its hearings revealed the industry’s scandalous conditions, and its report eventually resulted in the Ontario Health and Safety (ohs ) Act in Ontario. It did not cover the miners until 1984, so they worked through their internal health and safety committees to gain improvements in the work environment. Others have discussed this situation in relation to the emergence of the ohs and environmental movements. This paper discusses the events in terms of the mine owners’ attitudes towards their employees, the industry’s relationship to governments, and the impact of the uranium mining industry (part of the nuclear industry) on the local community and environment. Abstract: Les mineurs d’uranium a Elliot Lake a entame une greve sauvage en 1974 pour manifester leurs preoccupations de la sante au travail apres une augmentation soudaine des cas de cancer. Ils ont appris que le gouvernement provincial avait connu des mauvaises conditions de travail causant leurs maladies, mais ne les avait pas informes des dangers ni avait agi pour ameliorer leur situation.Par suite de la pression syndicale et politique, le gouvernement de l’Ontario a cree la Commission Ham pour enqueter et formuler des recommandations. Ses audiences ont revele des conditions scandaleuses de l’industrie, et son rapport a finalement abouti a l’adoption de la Loi de l’Ontario sur la sante et la securite au travail (sst ) en Ontario. Cette loi ne couvrait pas les mineurs jusqu’en 1984, alors que ces derniers travaillaient au sein de sur leurs comites de sante et de securite internes pour obtenir des ameliorations dans l’environnement de travail. D’autres ont discute de cette situation par rapport a l’emergence de la sst et aux mouvements environnementaux. Cet article discute des evenements en terme d’attitudes des proprietaires de mines envers leurs employes, les relations de l’industrie aupres des gouvernements, et l’impact de l’industrie miniere de l’uranium (qui fait partie de l’industrie nucleaire) sur la communaute locale et l’environnement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207