MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116663670 · doi:10.1109/lmwc.2010.2080670

Transient Behavioral Modeling of Nonlinear I/O Drivers Combining Neural Networks and Equivalent Circuits

2010· article· en· W2116663670 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityBlackberry (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkNonlinear systemTransient (computer programming)Behavioral modelingComputer scienceElectronic engineeringEquivalent circuitProperty (philosophy)Signal integrityElectronic circuitBiological neural networkSIGNAL (programming language)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMachine learningVoltageElectrical engineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, a new method for nonlinear behavioral modeling of high-speed I/O drivers is presented, combining neural networks with driver specific circuit knowledge. In the proposed technique, the circuit knowledge of the driver is exploited to preserve the physical property of the driver. In addition, several neural network sub-models are incorporated into the overall model structure to effectively compensate the missing information in the existing buffer models, when dealing with analog input signals of various shapes. The validity and efficiency of the proposed technique are demonstrated through the modeling of a commercial I/O driver and the use of the resulting model for signal integrity simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.738

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it