MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116675257 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2009.5117790

Low-order fixed denominator IIR VFD filter design

2009· article· en· W2116675257 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfinite impulse responseMathematicsFilter design2D FiltersFinite impulse responseNetwork synthesis filtersDigital filterFilter (signal processing)Control theory (sociology)Prototype filterPolynomialReduction (mathematics)Adaptive filterAlgorithmApplied mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-stage design method of low-order fixed denominator IIR variable fractional delay (VFD) digital filters is presented in this paper. In the first stage, a set of FIR fractional delay (FD) filters are designed first. Each FIR FD filter design problem is formulated in the peak-constrained weighted least-squares (PCWLS) sense and solved by the projected least-squares (PLS) algorithm. Then, model reduction technique is applied on a time-domain average FIR filter to obtain the fixed denominator. The remaining numerators of the IIR FD filters can be obtained by solving linear equations derived from the orthogonality principle. In the second stage of the design, these FD filter coefficients are to be approximated by polynomial functions of FD. Three sets of filter-examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed design method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207