MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116675986 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2005.844687

Wide-Band High-Efficiency Printed Loop Antenna Design for Wireless Communication Systems

2005· article· en· W2116675986 on OpenAlexaff
Tayeb A. Denidni, Han‐Seung Lee, Yong Cheol Lim, Q. Rao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmnidirectional antennaAntenna efficiencyAntenna measurementElectronic engineeringCoaxial antennaLoop antennaEngineeringRadiation patternBandwidth (computing)Electrical engineeringAntenna (radio)Computer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new wide-band high-efficiency coplanar waveguide-fed printed loop antenna is presented for wireless communication systems in this paper. By adjusting geometrical parameters, the proposed antenna can easily achieve a wide bandwidth. To optimize the antenna performances, a parametric study was conducted with the aid of a commercial software, and based on the optimized geometry, a prototype was designed, fabricated, and tested. The simulated and measured results confirmed that the proposed antenna can operate at (1.68-2.68 GHz) band and at (1.46-2.6 GHz) band with bandwidth of 1 and 1.14 GHz, respectively. Moreover, the antenna has a nearly omnidirectional radiation pattern with a reasonable gain and high efficiency. Due to the above characteristics, the proposed antenna is very suitable for applications in PCS and IMT2000 systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207