Déterminer les tendances et les transitions dans la prise en charge de patients atteints de schizophrénie aux consultations externes des hôpitaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La schizophrénie s'associe à de nombreuses rechutes et à des frais d'hospitalisation importants en soins de courte et de longue durée. Les auteurs étudient les schèmes de prise en charge de la schizophrénie de six programmes de santé mentale en consultations externes afin de déterminer les pratiques exemplaires des services de consultations externes auprès de cette population. Le présent rapport traite des thèmes et tendances préliminaires qui contribuent à la compliance au traitement ainsi que des issues cliniques positives. Les thèmes abordés sont la continuité des soins et la gestion des transitions, la prise en charge des comorbidités, le traitement vers le mieux-être, l'importance de la communication au sein des équipes multidisciplinaires et la prise en charge des médicaments. Des idées qui appuient la promotion de ces thèmes sont également présentées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".