MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116696736 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2011.6026507

A power-efficient dual-tank FSK demodulator for passive wireless microsystems

2011· article· en· W2116696736 on OpenAlexaff
Xiongliang Lai, Fei Yuan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency-shift keyingDemodulationVoltageElectrical engineeringVoltage multiplierElectronic engineeringEngineeringVoltage regulationDropout voltageChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dual-tank FSK demodulator to boost the amplitude of the received signal at FSK carrier frequencies subsequently power conversion efficiency is presented. A fast energy depletion technique is proposed to increase the data rate. In addition, a full-wave quadruple voltage multiplier with low substrate leakage currents is proposed to produce dual-polarity supply voltages required for draining the resonant tanks. Data are recovered by comparing output voltages of the resonant tanks with a preset reference voltage at the beginning of each FSK interval. The FSK demodulator has been designed in IBM 0.13-μm 1.2-V CMOS process. Simulation results show that the power conversion efficiency of the proposed dual-tank voltage multiplier is 30 times that of a corresponding single-tank voltage multiplier while the substrate leakage current of the proposed voltage multiplier is nearly 1000 times smaller than that of conventional voltage multipliers. The proposed FSK demodulator can transmit at 3 Mbps with 5/10-MHz FSK carriers while consuming only a few tens of μW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207