MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116717850 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2009.5090156

Filtering and removal of the effects of the transducers on the acoustical impulse response of concert halls

2009· article· en· W2116717850 on OpenAlexaff
D. Frey, Victor Coelho, Rangaraj M. Rangayyan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoudspeakerImpulse responseAcousticsTransducerInfinite impulse responseFrequency responseDigital filterInverse filterFinite impulse responseImpulse (physics)Computer scienceTransfer functionTransient responseEngineeringFilter (signal processing)Electronic engineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringInverseMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital signal processing (DSP) has enabled the exponential sine sweep (ESS) method of measuring the acoustical parameters of a concert hall to be increasingly efficient. Part of this is due to the implementation of software modules that perform specific tasks such as filtering and equalization. In using a measurement loudspeaker source for the sine sweep process, it is necessary to: first, derive a loudspeaker prefilter to ensure that the resulting output sweep possesses a frequency response that is reasonably uniform; and second, to derive a transducer inverse filter in order to remove the effects of the loudspeakers and microphones from the measured impulse response of the hall. In the present work, by measuring the acoustical impulse response function (AIRF) of three different halls, using a high-frequency (HF) horn-loaded loudspeaker system as a reference source, it is shown that the effects of the transducers may be effectively filtered and removed from the AIRF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207