MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116753880 · doi:10.1109/icip.2000.900878

Human perception of mismatched stereoscopic 3D inputs

2002· article· en· W2116753880 on OpenAlexaff
Lew B. Stelmach, Wa James Tam, Daniel V. Meegan, A. Vincent, P. Corriveau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStereoscopyComputer sciencePerceptionComputer visionStereopsisArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionComputer graphics (images)PsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bandwidth required to transmit stereoscopic video images is nominally twice that required for standard, monoscopic images. One method of reducing the required bandwidth is to code the two video streams asymmetrically. We assessed the perceptual impact of this bandwidth-reduction technique for low-pass filtering, DCT-based quantization, and a combination of filtering and quantization. It was found that the binocular percept depended on the type of degradation: for low-pass filtering, the binocular percept was dominated by the high-quality image, whereas for quantization it corresponded to the average of the inputs to the two eyes. The results indicated that asymmetrical coding is a promising technique for reducing storage and transmission bandwidth of stereoscopic sequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207