MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116786170 · doi:10.5539/jpl.v3n1p105

Comment on Chinese Limited Liability Company’s Stock Rights Transfer System ------In perspective of Article 72 in Company Law of the People’s Republic of China

2010· article· en· W2116786170 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shanling Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Politics and Law · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLimited liabilityStock (firearms)Joint-stock companyParent companyShareholderLiabilityBusinessCorporate lawChinaLimited companyLawSettlement (finance)AccountingLaw and economicsSubsidiaryCorporate governanceFinanceEconomicsPolitical scienceMultinational corporationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

company’s stock rights transfer under common conditions. However, it can not solve all practical issues effectively. In perspective of Article 72 of Company Law, this paper probes into the progresses and the defects of limited liability company’s stock rights transfer system, and analyzes some hot issues, including how some shareholders actualize their preemptive right to purchase the stock rights in practice, and how to evaluate the effect of articles of association as there is a conflict concerning stock rights transfer with Company Law, with the hope of benefiting the study of limited liability company’s stock rights transfer and the settlement of practical corporate issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0200.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Politics and LawSame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207