MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116815616 · doi:10.1109/whispers.2010.5594880

Current airborne LWIR HSI remote sensing activities at Defence R&D Canada — Valcartier

2010· article· en· W2116815616 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eldon Puckrin, Caroline S. Turcotte, Josée Lévesque, Jean‐Marc Thériault, Hugo Lavoie, François Bouffard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperspectral imagingRemote sensingLongwavePixelComputer scienceCalibrationImage resolutionRadiometric calibrationSpectral resolutionScannerCompensation (psychology)Artificial intelligenceEnvironmental scienceComputer visionPhysicsOpticsGeologySpectral line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, DRDC Valcartier has been investigating longwave hyperspectral imaging (HSI) remote sensing techniques using airborne sensors. There is currently an initiative to test the commercially available ground-based Hyper-Cam HSI system, developed by Telops, on a stabilized airborne platform with an integrated image motion compensation capability. The Hyper-Cam is also based on the Fourier-transform technology yielding high spectral resolution and enabling high accuracy radiometric calibration. It provides passive signature measurement capability, with up to 320×256 pixels at spectral resolutions of up to 0.25 cm-1. To our knowledge, the Hyper-Cam is the first commercial airborne hyperspectral imaging sensor based on Fourier-transform infrared technology. Airborne measurements and some preliminary performance criteria for the Hyper-Cam are presented in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207