MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116826706 · doi:10.1145/1384429.1384454

Managing ambiguity in mathematical matrices

2007· article· en· W2116826706 on OpenAlexaff
David Tausky, George Labahn, Edward Lank, Mirette Marzouk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmbiguityEllipsis (linguistics)RowComputer scienceMatrix (chemical analysis)Row and column spacesAlgorithmCluster analysisTheoretical computer scienceAlgebra over a fieldMathematicsArtificial intelligenceProgramming languagePure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we describe strategies for recognizing and using hand drawn matrices in a pen math system. This includes a new technique to recognize common short-forms of writing matrices using ellipsis (...). Ellipsis are commonly used in sketched matrices to illustrate the structure of a matrix without fully specifying the matrix. A second contribution of this paper is a new method to estimate the parameters of the hand drawn matrix, such as the number and position of the rows and columns. This is done using a modified clustering algorithm, allowing one to reduce the number of hard-coded constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.012
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207