Isolation of human single chain antibodies (scFv) against human TNF-α from human peripheral blood lymphocyte-SCID mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
By developing an appropriate immunization protocol for SCID (hu-PBL-SCID) mice engrafted with human peripheral blood lymphocytes in combination with scFv phage display library, we were able to establish an efficient strategy to obtain human scFv clones against a human self-antigen, TNF-alpha. The mice pretreated with gamma-radiation (3Gy) and anti-asialo GM1 antibody were immunized with a mixture of human TNF-alpha-keyhole limpet hemocyanin and Freund's adjuvant. Human antibody maturation was suggested to be induced in the mice with the immunization protocol. The scFv clones obtained from the mice were shown to exhibit binding affinities in the range of 10(7)-10(8) M(-1). Together with our previously published work on the isolation of respiratory syncytial virus neutralizing scFvs, the results of this study have implicated that this combined approach is one of the effective alternatives for the cloning of human monoclonal antibodies specific for a wide range of antigens of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".