MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116881676 · doi:10.1109/wimob.2009.71

iCCA-MAP: A New Mobile Node Localization Algorithm

2009· article· en· W2116881676 on OpenAlexafffund
Shafagh Alikhani, Marc St‐Hilaire, Thomas Kunz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNational Science Council
KeywordsComputer scienceNode (physics)AlgorithmWireless sensor networkPosition (finance)Iterative methodWirelessMobile telephonyReal-time computingMobile radioComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurately determining the location of mobile wireless sensor nodes in real-time is essential for many purposes. This paper proposes a new and efficient algorithm for localization of mobile node(s) within a WSN. The proposed algorithm, called iterative CCA-MAP (iCCA-MAP), is based on the CCA-MAP algorithm which applies an efficient nonlinear data mapping technique. The latter has been shown to perform extremely well for localizing stationary nodes in WSNs. Simulation results show that the localization error results for both CCA-MAP and iCCA-MAP are similar. However, the computational time required for obtaining location results using the iterative CCA-MAP scheme is far smaller than that of the original CCA-MAP. The advantage of the proposed algorithm is that it can provide the mobile node's location information at near real-time, allowing for it to be applied at a much higher frequency in order to provide up-to-date estimations of the mobile node's position, which can result in a lower localization error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207