MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116887614 · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxq079

A particular diffusion model for incomplete longitudinal data: application to the multicenter AIDS cohort study

2011· article· en· W2116887614 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiostatistics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMissing dataCovariateBayesian probabilityGibbs samplingLongitudinal dataMulticenter AIDS Cohort StudyStatisticsSampling (signal processing)Computer scienceEconometricsMathematicsMedicineData miningHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Longitudinal studies, in which individuals are measured repeatedly in time, are often incomplete. We model continuous-time longitudinal data from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study using a diffusion model in which the diffusion parameters are functions of the covariates. These data are jointly modeled with the process of time-to-death due to AIDS. We show that, even for large data sets with a large number of missing variables, a Bayesian analysis is feasible using Gibbs sampling and compare a complete case analysis with a Bayesian treatment of missing values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.949
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it