MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116913423 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.1100.0383

Algorithms for Coxianization of Phase-Type Generators

2010· article· en· W2116913423 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenerator (circuit theory)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsType (biology)Phase (matter)AlgorithmComputer scienceMathematicsPhysicsPower (physics)Thermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops algorithms for finding Coxian generators to phase-type (PH)-majorize a PH-generator T with only real eigenvalues. In the first part of this paper, we investigate matrices S and P satisfying TP = PS and Pe = e. Conditions on T are identified for S to be an ordered Coxian generator and for P to be nonnegative, which consequently implies that S PH-majorizes T. It is shown that every PH-generator with only real eigenvalues is PH-majorized by some Coxian generator. In the second part of this paper, the results on S and P and the conditions on T are used to develop efficient algorithms for Coxianization of PH-generators. Numerical examples are presented for a comparison between the developed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.378

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it