MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116931136 · doi:10.1177/0731684407084213

Matrix and Fibre Stiffness Degradation of a Quasi-isotrope Graphite Epoxy Laminate Under Flexural Bending Test

2008· article· en· W2116931136 on OpenAlexaff
E. H. Irhirane, Jamal Echaabi, M. Aboussaleh, Mohamed Hattabi, F. Trochu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceEpoxyComposite materialFlexural strengthThree point flexural testBendingFinite element methodStructural engineeringStiffnessComposite laminatesIsotropyComposite numberGraphite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The permanent research of reliability and precision for failure criteria is a major concern for proper dimensioning of composite structures. Discrepancies are observed between theoretical results based on laminated theory or finite element analysis [Greif, R. and Chapon, E. (1993). Investigation of Successive Failure Modes in Graphite Epoxy Laminated Composites Beams, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 29; Echaabi, J., Trochu, F., Pham, F. X. T. and Ouelette, M. (1996). Theroretical and Experimental Investigation of Failure and Damage Progression of Quasi-Isotropic Graphite Epoxy Composites in Flexural Bending Test, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 15(7)] and experiments. In order to investigate these problems, numerical simulations were carried out to study the behavior of graphite-epoxy [[+45/-45/90/0] 3 ] laminates subjected to three point bending tests. Two approaches were followed. The first one is based on laminate theory with transverse shear. The successive failures, failure modes, progression of failure and the effect of the geometrical characteristics of the specimens were analyzed during loading. Various failure criteria have been studied to predict the load when the weakest ply fails under flexural bending. Traditional failure criteria and new ones taking into account physical considerations were used. These criteria are tested with two models of stiffness reduction to account for ply failure. The second approach is based on a finite element analysis of laminate, in which three-dimensional failure criteria were implemented. Finally, the results obtained with these two approaches are compared with theoretical and experimental predictions of the scientific literature [Echaabi, J., Trochu, F., Pham, F. X. T. and Ouelette, M. (1996). Theroretical and Experimental Investigation of Failure and Damage Progression of Quasi-Isotropic Graphite Epoxy Composites in Flexural Bending Test, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 15(7)].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.632

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Reinforced Plastics and CompositesSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207