MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116958993 · doi:10.1109/aps.1996.550008

An investigation of a novel broadband dielectric resonator antenna

2002· article· en· W2116958993 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ittipiboon, A. Petosa, D. Roscoe, M. Cuhaci

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandDielectric resonator antennaDielectricResonatorDielectric resonatorOptoelectronicsAntenna (radio)Materials scienceElectronic engineeringComputer scienceTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, dielectric resonator antennas (DRA) have been proposed as an alternative to the popular microstrip patch. Since then, research has continued, extending their performance capabilities and confirming their potential as low profile and efficient antenna elements for array applications. Also a single-point fed dielectric resonator antenna has been reported, capable of radiating a circularly polarized signal with a much wider axial ratio bandwidth than a similar single-point fed microstrip patch. Further capability enhancements of a dielectric resonator antenna have recently been demonstrated by fabricating the antenna from ferrite material. With a properly biased static magnetic field, it has been shown to possess frequency tuning and polarization diversity properties. The purpose of this paper is to present a novel development of a DRA which possesses a much wider operational bandwidth than previously reported. This improvement can be accomplished with a simple slot feed and without an elaborate matching circuit or a complicated stacking procedure which is generally required by the microstrip patch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207